Instructors' perceptions of digital technology use in technical and vocational education and training
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the perspectives of TVET instructors on the use of digital technology and the support they receive at a Vocational Training Centre in Namibia. Technology integration in education and training has elicited various responses from different stakeholders, influencing business operations and it will enhance teaching and learning outcomes in vocational settings. Furthermore, the willingness of TVET staff and instructors to adopt and make use of technology indicates an institution's readiness to incorporate technology into the learning environment.
A qualitative research approach and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) were employed, using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with a sample of TVET instructors and management from VTC in Namibia. The data gathered were analysis thematically using the Provalis Research QDA miner application and Microsoft Word text-based data to relate to instructors' experiences with digital technology use and the adequacy of support mechanisms. The study revealed that the integration of technology in the classroom was potentially beneficial, aligned with the training objectives of the respondents, convenient, and secure in aiding the TVET institution in achieving its educational goals by improving instructional delivery and enhancing trainee engagement.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Alase, A. 2017. The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9.
Babo, R. & Azevedo, A. (Eds.). (2012). Higher Education Institutions and Learning Management System: Adoption and Standardisation. IGI Globa.
Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M.M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T.I. (2018). Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 33(1): 94-111.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise, and Health, 11(4): 589-597.
Chinyere, A., Chijioke, O. P., & Benjamin, O. (2015). Towards quality Technical Vocational Education and Training programmes in Nigeria: Challenges and improvement strategies. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1): 1 – 79.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.
Etikan, I/S Abubakar/RS Alkassim. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling, in: American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5 (1): 1, [online] doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2): 89 –106.
Goodson, C. 2017. In Support of Student Academic Success with Technology: The Student View.
Gyimah, N. (2020). Assessment of Technical and Vocational Education and Training on the Development of the World's Economy: Perspective of Africa, Asia, and Europe. Asia and Europe (February 19, 2020).
Hoftijzer, M., Levin, V., Santos, I. & Weber, M. (2020). TVET (Technical and Vocational Education and Training) in the times of COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities.
Horvitz, B. S., Garcia, L. R., Mitchell, R. G., & Calhoun, C. D. (2019). An examination of instructional approaches in online technical education in community colleges. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1613.
Khan, A. R., & Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2020). Adoption of LMS in Higher Educational Institutions of the Middle East (Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation) (1st ed. 2021 ed.). Springer.
Kumar, P., & Kumar, V. (2020). Technical and vocational education and training in India: A paradigm shift in the digital era. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(3), 263-280.
Kuo, Y. (2017). Learning through Blogging: Students' Perspectives in Collaborative Blog-Enhanced Learning Communities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2): 37–50.
Majid, U. (2018). Research Fundamentals: Study Design, Population, and Sample
Mohammadyari, S. & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82: 11-25.
Nooruddin, S., & Karachic Grammar School. (2017). Technical and vocational education and training for economic growth in Pakistan, Journal educational development, 4(1): 130–141.
Nundkumar, A & Subban, S. (2018). Embracing the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Risk-based perspectives of the South African TVET college sector. Journal of Contemporary Management, 15: 1-24.
Obwoge, M, E., & Kwamboka, O, S. (2017). E-Learning in TVET: An Opportunity for Developing Countries. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(3): 2455–2526
Redouane, L. (2020). “Cours en ligne en Algérie: La liste des chaînes scolaires sur YouTube.”
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1), 41–42.
Torres, K.M. & Giddie, L. (2020). Educator perceptions and use of technology in South African Colleges. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(2): 117-126.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2017). Guide to Measuring Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Education.Montreal.UIS.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2): 273-315.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2): 186-204
Wark, N. & Mohamed, A. (2020). Commonwealth of learning. Sustainable development and education in the fourth industrial revolution(4IR). A Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence International.
Wichadee, S. (2015). Factors Related to Faculty Members' Attitude and Adoption of a Learning Management System. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 1–9.
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3): 443-488.
Yilmaz, A. (2021). The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 163-199.