Guidelines for managing and utilizing generative artificial intelligence writing tools
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students use artificial intelligence (AI) generative writing tools to complete writing assignments, regardless of whether such tools are allowed or not. The quality of writing produced by AI tools is superior to that of many university students in terms of grammatical correctness, reduced spelling errors, increased average word length, expanded vocabulary, varied sentence structure, decreased word repetition, and increased punctuation usage. This re-search suggests ways in which AI generative writing tools can be used to improve student writing. It discusses how to make students better editors, so they can improve ChatGPT’s output or tailor it to specific needs. It also provides insights on how to make students better fact checkers, so that they can eliminate hallucinations that AI writing tools generate. These errors of fact make the AI writing tools far less valuable than they would be otherwise. Our work highlights the need to focus writing exercises across the curriculum more on editing and fact checking. We provide numerous insights into programs such as ChatGPT to help instructors without a technical background identify, understand, and process student writing generated by such programs in an improved fashion. We identify several tricks that students use to disguise writing produced by ChatGPT.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
ABET. (2023). ABET. Retrieved Septermber 27, 2023, from https://www.abet.org
Abreu, J. S. (2023, September 6). Founding Fathers of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from Quidgest, 2021: https://quidgest.com/en/blog-en/ai-founding-fathers/
CERN. (2023, 09 27). A Short History of the Web. Retrieved from https://home.web.cern.ch/science/computing/birth-web/short-history-web
ChatGPT. (2023). ChatGPT ― Release Notes. . Retrieved September 12, 2023, from https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes
ChatGPT 3.5. (2023). ChatGPT 3.5. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://chat.openai.com/.
CK-12. (2023). How many atoms exist in the universe? Retrieved September 12, 2023, from https://www.ck12.org/flexi/earth-science/atoms-and-molecules/how-many-atoms-exist-in-the-universe
Davis, Z. (1986, May). Writer’s Workbench. PC Mag, pp. 190-199.
Duarte, F. (2023). Number of ChatGPT Users . Retrieved September 06, 2023, from https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users
Gorin, R. (2009, 11 22). Ralph Gorin, talk, gold medal for spell checker. Retrieved 9 5, 2023, from Spotlight at Stanford: https://exhibits.stanford.edu/ai/catalog/mz021fp0267
Grammarly. (2023, 09 5). Grammarly. Retrieved from https://www.grammarly.com/
Greenlaw, R. (2012). Technical Writing, Presentation Skills, and Online Communication: Professional Tools and Insights. xxi + 225 pages: IGI Global.
Greenlaw, R., Mufeti, K., & Mwatilifange, S. (2023). Experiences with Artificial intelligence Generative Writing Tools in Computing Curricula.
Greenlaw, R., Mufeti, K., & Mwatilifange, S. (n.d.). Experiences with Artificial Intelligence Generative Writing Tools in Computing Curricula, manuscript, 14 pages.
Horn, B., & Winston, P. (1975). Personal Computers. Datamation, 21(5), 111-115.
Jarrah, A., Wardat, Y., & Fildago, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism : What does the literature say? . Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4).
Meyer, J. G., Urbanowicz, R. J., Martin, P. C., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P., . . . Moore, J. H. (2023). ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Academia: Opportunities and Challenges, 16(20), Biodata Mining.
Moor, J. (2006). The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years. AI Magazine, 27(4), 87-89.
Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits. Electronics, 114-117.
OpenAI. (2023). Models Featured in OpenAI Research. Retrieved September 3, 2023, from https://platform.openai.com/docs/model-index-for-researchers
Peterson, J. L. (1980). Computer Programs for Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors. Communications of the ACM, 23(12), 676-687.
QuillBot. (2023, 9 5). QuillBot. Retrieved from https://www.quillbot.com/
Rahman, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9).
Science Direct. (2023). Artificial Neural Networks. Retrieved September 12, 2023, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/artificial-neural-networks
Wikipedia. (2023, 09 4). Spell checker. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. . Retrieved from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spell_checker
Wolfram, S. (2023). What is ChatGPT Doing … and Why Does It Work? Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/