Perspectives on complex click consonants of Khoekhoegowab Towards a rethinking in the description of Khoekhoegowab click sounds
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper offers an alternative way of describing what is called complex click consonants in Khoesan languages. Using data obtained from key informants and focused groups from the Karas, Hardap and the Kunene regions of Namibia as well as relevant literature we argue that co-articulated clicks should be treated as one sound represented by one grapheme. We argue that plain clicks in Khoekhoegowab are not glotalised as perceived because the glotalisation comes from the accompanying vowel. Using articulatory, acoustic and auditory phonetics we also problematize the notion of ‘complexity’ in the click complexes by showing that these click consonants play the same morphophonological role as consonants found in non-click languages. Thereafter the implications of this for cluster and unitary analysis are also discussed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Beach, D.M. 1938. The phonetics of the Hottentot Language. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd.
Bleek, W. H. I. 1858. The library of Sir George Grey. vol. 1, part 1. London: Trübner & Co.
Breckwoldt, G. H. 1972. ‘A critical investigation of click symbolism.’ In Andre Rigault & Rene Charbonneau (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Pp.281-293. Paris: Mouton.
Brugman, J.C 2009. Segments Tones and Distribution in Khoekhoe Prosody. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
Curriculum Committee for Khoekhoegowab. 2003. KhoeKhoegowab: 3ǁî xoaǀgaub/Orthography 3. Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan.
Haacke, W. H. G. 1989. ‘Nama: Survival through standardization.’ In István Fodor & Claude Hagège (eds.), Language reform: History and future. vol. IV. pp.397-429. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Haacke, W. H. G. 1999. The tonology of Khoekhoe (Nama-Damara). (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 16). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Haacke W. H. G., Eliphas Eiseb. 2002. A Khoekhoegowab Dictionary. Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan.
Hagman, R. 1977. Nama Hottentot Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications
Hammersley. M & Atkinson. P. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Heath, S.B. & Street, B.V. 2008. Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. Amsterdam Avenue: Teachers’ College Press.
Kilarski and Kolaczyk 2012. On Extremes in linguistic complexity. Phonetic accounts of Iroquoian, Polynesian and Khoesan. Historiographia Linguistica 39:2/3. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Lepsius, R. 1855. Standard alphabet for reducing unwritten languages and foreign graphic systems to a uniform orthography in European letters. London: Williams & Norgate.
Lepsius, R. 1863. Standard alphabet for reducing unwritten languages and foreign graphic systems to a uniform orthography in European letters. (2nd edition). London: Williams & Norgate.
Miller et al. 2007. ‘The sounds of Nǀuu: Place and airstream contrasts.’ Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory. 16: 101-160
Namaseb, et al 2008. The Standard Unified Orthography for Khoe and San Languages of Southern Africa. CASAS Monograph Series No. 232.
Tindall, H. 1856. A Grammar and Vocabulary of the Namaqua-Hottentot Language. St. Georges: G.J. Pike’s Machine Printing Office.
Trailll, A 1985. Phonetic and Phonological Studies of !Xόõ Bushman (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 1) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.